Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09624718"

See other formats


AppL No. 09/624,718 



REMARKS 

Claims 1-10 remain in this application. Claims 1-10 have been amended, and new claims 
11-14 have been added. Attached hereto is a marked-up version of the changes made to the 
specification and claims by the current amendment. The attached page is captioned " Versions 
with Markings to Show Changes Made. " A request for continued examination is filed with 
this Response. 

Claims 1-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kochi et 
al. in view of Yoshida et al. Applicant respectfully traverses this rejection because the cited 
references, alone or in combination, do not disclose or suggest the timing adjustment means 
using a control signal other than the clear signal or the transfer signal (used in the operation of 
the operation means) in the timing adjustment, as now recited in independent claim 1. 

As amended, claim 1 calls for the operation of operation means being based on at least 
one of a clear signal or a transfer signal, and outputting means for receiving the result of the 
operation of the operation means and outputting the result of the operation for each of the 
elements. Furthermore, claim 1 recites that the timing adjustment means uses a control signal 
other than the clear signal or the transfer signal in the timing adjustment. 

It is stated in the Office Action that the claimed operation means is disclosed by the 
arithmetic operation output 50 in an embodiment of Kochi et al. shown in Fig. 19 A. The 
Examiner, however, recognizes that this embodiment does not disclose the timing adjustment 
means, but asserts that this feature is disclosed in another embodiment shown in Fig. 12 of the 
reference. Briefly, Fig. 12 of Kochi et al. shows an arithmetic operation circuit block 801 -A 
which has seven inputs that are connected to corresponding latch circuits 12- A. 

Claim 1 now calls for the operation of the operating means to be based on at least one of 
the clear signal and the transfer signal. These features are not disclosed or suggested in the 
arithmetic operation output 50 shown in Fig. 19A of Kochi et al. Claim 1 further calls for the 
timing adjustment means to use a control signal other than the clear signal or the transfer signal, 
which is also not disclosed or suggested in Fig. 12 of Kochi et al. Moreover, even if the 
arithmetic operation output of Kochi et al. were to include the claimed clear signal and the 
transfer signal, the reference still would not disclose or suggest the timing adjustment means 
using a control signal other than the clear signal or the transfer signal of the operation means, as 
in the present invention. 



5 



Appl. No. 09/624,718 



The Yoshida et al. reference is cited in the Office Action as disclosing a plurality of 
arithmetic units for parallel processing. This reference also does not disclose or suggest the 
operation of the operation means being based on a clear signal and a transfer signal, or the timing 
adjustment means using a control signal other than the clear signal or the transfer signal. Thus, 
even if these references were combined, they still would not disclose or suggest the claimed 
operation means and the timing adjustment means as now recited in claim 1. For these reasons, 
claim 1 and its dependent claims 2-5 are allowable over Kochi et al in view of Yoshida et al. 

Independent claim 6 has also been amended to recite, in a method format, the features of 
the operating means and timing adjustment means as now described in claim 1. As such, claim 6 
and its dependent claims 7-10 are also allowable for the same reasons given with respect to claim 
1. 

New independent claim 1 1 describes in part operation means which is operated based on 
at least a clear signal or a transfer signal. The operation of the operation means includes a 
plurality of modes, which are selected based on a control signal other than the clear signal or the 
transfer signal. As discussed above, the arithmetic operation output 50 of Kochi et al. does not 
disclose or suggest the clear signal or the transfer signal. Even assuming that the arithmetic 
operation output of Kochi et al. somehow discloses the clear signal or the transfer signal, it 
certainly does not disclose or suggest that the operation means includes a plurality of modes 
which are selected based on a control signal other than the clear signal or the transfer signal. 
Claim 12 describes in a method format features similar to those of claim 11. For these reasons, 
new independent claims 1 1 and 12 are allowable over Kochi et al. and Yoshida et al., alone or in 
combination. 

New claims 13-15 depend from claim 1 and are allowable for the reasons given with 
respect to claim 1 . 



6 



Appl. No. 09/624,718 



• 




In light of the above, Applicants respectfully submit that claims 1-14 are both not 
anticipated and non-obvious over the art of record. Accordingly, Applicants respectfully request 
that a timely Notice of Allowance be issued in this case. 



Respectfully submitted, 
BELL, BOYD & LLOYD LLC 



B. Joe fom 
Reg. No. 41,895 
P.O. Box 1135 
Chicago, Illinois 60690-1 135 
Phone: (312) 807-4354 




7 



Appl. No. 09/624,718 




VERSION WITH MARKINGS TO SHOW CHANGES MADE 

In the Claims : 

Claims 1-10 have been amended as follows: 

1 . (Twice amended) An image processing apparatus having an optical area in which 
a plurality of elements are disposed in a matrix, comprising: 

light reception means for receiving light introduced into said elements of said optical area 
and photoelectrical^ converting the light; 

arithm e tic operation means including a plurality of arithm e tic operating units, each of 
which arithm e tically operates a signal obtained for one of said elements by the photoelectric 
conversion by said light reception means in accordance with a predetermined rule , the operation 
of said operating means being based on at least one of a clear signal and a transfer signal ; 

outputting means for receiving a result of the operation of said operation means and 
outputting a-the result of the arithm e tic operation of oaid arithmetic op e ration m e ans for each of 
said elements; and 

timing adjustment means for adjusting a timing at which the result of the arithm e tic 
operation is to b e outputt e d output for each of said plurality of elements from said outputting 
means , said timing adjustment means using a control signal other than the clear signal or the 
transfer signal in the timing adjustment . 

2. (Once amended) An image processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein 
said arithm e tic operation means includes storage means for successively storing a plurality of 
signals at different timings obtained by the photoelectric conversion. 

3. (Once amended) An image processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein 
said arithm e tic operation means executes a_comparison arithm e tic operation for a combination of 
a plurality of ones of the signals stored in said storage means. 

4. (Once amended) An image processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein 
the comparison arithm e tic operation includes an arithmetic operation for determining a 
maximum value or a minimum value of the signal. 



8 



Appl. No. 09/624,718 



5. (Once amended) An image processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein 
said outputting means outputs results of the an_arithmetic operation for each of the rows or the 
columns of said elements at a timing adjusted by said timing adjustment means. 

6. (Twice amended) An image processing method for an image processing 
apparatus which has an optical area in which a plurality of elements are disposed in a matrix, 
comprising: 

a light reception step of receiving light introduced into said elements of said optical area 
and photoelectrically converting the light; 

an arithm e tic operation step of arithm e tically operating a plurality of signals in parallel 
obtained for each of said elements by the photoelectric conversion of the processing in the light 
reception step in accordance with a predetermined rule , the operation being based on at least one 
of clear signal and transfer signal ; 

an outputting step of receiving a result of the operation from the operation step and 
outputting a- the result of the arithm e tic operation of th e proc e ssing in th e arithm e tic step for 
each of said elements; and 

a timing adjustment step of adjusting a timing at which the result of the arithm e tic 
operation is to be outputt e d output for each of said plurality of elements by the processing in the 
outputting step , said timing adjustment step using a control signal other than the clear signal or 
the transfer signal in the timing adjustment . 

7. (Once amended) An image processing method according to claim 6, wherein the 
arithm e tic operation step includes a storage step of successively storing a plurality of signals at 
different timings obtained by the photoelectric conversion. 

8. (Once amended) An image processing method according to claim 7, wherein the 
arithm e tic operation step executes comparison arithm e tic operation for a combination of a 
plurality of ones of the signals stored by the storage step. 



9 



Appl. No. 09/624,718 



9. (Once amended) An image processing method according to claim 8, wherein the 
comparison arithm e tic operation includes an arithmetic operation for determining a maximum 
value or a minimum value of the signal. 

10. (Once amended) An image processing method according to claim 6, wherein the 
outputting means outputs results of the an arithmetic operation for each of the rows or the 
columns of said elements at a timing adjusted by the timing adjustment step. 

New claims 11-15 have been added. 



10